News
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Adopts First Rules of Evidence
News Article
May 08, 1998
HARRISBURG, MAY 8, 1998 – The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania announced its adoption today of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's first Rules of Evidence. The effective date of the Rules will be October 1, 1998. Modeled in part upon the Federal Rules of Evidence, Pennsylvania's new Rules of Evidence condense decades of Pennsylvania court decisions, rules and statutes so that practitioners and members of the judiciary can now have rules governing the admissibility of evidence available in a single reference. Prior to this historic event, lawyers and judges were required to consult several different resources in order to determine the admissibility of evidence in legal proceedings. The Rules of Evidence were adopted by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court upon the recommendation of its Ad Hoc Committee on Evidence. Chaired by former Lycoming County president judge Thomas C. Raup, the Committee consisted of Villanova Law School professor Leonard Packel (Editor), Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas judge Richard A. Lewis, and attorneys: David F. Binder (of Raynes, McCarty Binder Ross & Mundy), Raymond J. Bradley (of Wolf Block Schorr & Solis Cohen), Charles B. Gibbons, Esquire (of Klett Lieber Rooney & Schorling), John Edward Iole (of Jones Day Reavis & Pogue), and Ellen M. Viakley (of Manifesto & Donahoe, P.C.). Editorial assistance was also provided by Kathryn M. Stanchi, Esquire, during her tenure with Villanova Law School. (Ms. Stanchi is now affiliated with Temple University.) "The Ad Hoc Committee's work required detailed study and thoughtful deliberation prior to its submission of a proposal for the Supreme Court's consideration," said Chief Justice John P. Flaherty. "I commend the committee members' efforts and those of my colleague, Justice Ronald D. Castille, who served as the Court's liaison to the Committee." "My colleagues and I also appreciate the considerable input from members of the bar and the public which the Ad Hoc Committee received following publication of the proposed rules for public comment," said Chief Justice Flaherty. "The expertise gained during a public comment period is always of considerable value in shaping a final proposal." Mr. Justice Castille also noted the significant contributions by the Legislature and praised state Senate Judiciary Committee chair Stewart J. Greenleaf, and former state senator Craig Lewis for their efforts as well as the efforts of many other members of the General Assembly for their cooperation in the review and adoption process of this project.